Public research record · Editorial guide updated 2026-10-29

Meta model; version not publicly confirmed here: Unnamed third-party service

Review CAT-R15 · Catalogue R15, RAT-114

External-intrusion catalogueQualified

Meta-confirmed via direct press statement. Internet available through evaluation misconfiguration. AP search result supplies the statement; direct AP page could not be fetched. Do not assign a precise model from secondary speculation.

Reviewed: Not recorded · Rule: external-intrusion-v1

RogueWatchQualified

Meta’s original identifies pre-release Muse Spark 1.1, an Irregular test misconfiguration, and an unintended real-site exploit/database changes. This is the same existing RW-0028 / R15, not a new incident. Meta says the model followed the target named in its instructions; actual third-party authorization still absent. Useful model-attribution correction, with no extra case count.

Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1

Evidence status

RogueWatch confidence: confirmed. Meta-confirmed via direct press statement

Dates and discovery

Incident date
Before Aug 6, 2026; attack date undisclosed
Catalogue disclosure / source date
Added to research / record
Posted to RogueWatch
RW-0028:
First observed
Not recorded
Discovery channel
Not recorded

Related incident records: RW-0028 — published incident

Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.

Sources

Decision history

  1. · Assessment imported

    Imported the existing research decision. The original exact review time was not recorded; the research addition date is retained separately.

    Evidence source
  2. · Case-by-case comparison audit

    RAT-114: existing. Meta’s original identifies pre-release Muse Spark 1.1, an Irregular test misconfiguration, and an unintended real-site exploit/database changes. This is the same existing RW-0028 / R15, not a new incident. Meta says the model followed the target named in its instructions; actual third-party authorization still absent. Useful model-attribution correction, with no extra case count. Source checks: read: https://research.meta.ai/blog/addressing-third-party-testing-misconfiguration-muse-spark-1-1. Meta’s original identifies pre-release Muse Spark 1.1, an Irregular test misconfiguration, and an unintended real-site exploit/database changes. This is the same existing RW-0028 / R15, not a new incident. Meta says the model followed the target named in its instructions; actual third-party authorization still absent. Useful model-attribution correction, with no extra case count.

    Evidence source
  3. · Incident record added

    RW-0028. Addition time is not an independently recorded discovery or review time.

    Evidence source · Evidence source

A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.