Unknown models; benchmark attribution claimed: Unnamed archive, newspaper, wiki and GitHub services
Review CAT-U10 · Catalogue U10
UNVERIFIED — Reddit-only aggregate lead. Poster says their own investigation was read-only; origins of observed traffic unverified. Reviewed post supplies no underlying artifact links, victim names or verifiable model attribution. Possible overlap with known campaigns, hobbyists or honeypots. Not counted as a confirmed intrusion.
Reviewed: Not recorded · Rule: external-intrusion-v1
Evidence status
UNVERIFIED — Reddit-only aggregate lead
Dates and discovery
- Incident date
- Early September to mid-October 2026, as claimed
- Added to research / record
- Posted to RogueWatch
- No linked public incident
- First observed
- Not recorded
- Discovery channel
- Not recorded
When to reconsider
New original evidence establishing the unauthorized action, affected organization, model attribution or real-system impact.
Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.
Sources
- Reddit / u/CapitalKingGaming — I used my own swarm of agents to look for rogue-agent traces across the public webReddit discovery / discussion · www.reddit.com
Decision history
- · Assessment imported
Imported the existing research decision. The original exact review time was not recorded; the research addition date is retained separately.
Evidence source
A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.