Public research record · Editorial guide updated 2026-10-29

Cursor agent reportedly running Claude Opus 4.6: PocketOS production database hosted on Railway

Review CAT-X13 · Catalogue X13, RAT-020

External-intrusion catalogueOut of scope

EXCLUDED FROM BREAK-INS — provider-confirmed destructive action. Routine task; database deletion was not requested. Misuse of existing account credentials, not an external Railway breach. Original founder post was blocked; incident date and model attribution rely on quoted account. Permanent total loss is contradicted by Railway’s recovery statement.

Reviewed: Not recorded · Rule: external-intrusion-v1

RogueWatchQualified

User-approved own-operator scope; unauthorized deletion and recovery verified from listed sources.

Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1

Evidence status

RogueWatch confidence: confirmed. EXCLUDED FROM BREAK-INS — provider-confirmed destructive action

Dates and discovery

Incident date
2026-04-24 (founder’s April 25 account)
Catalogue disclosure / source date
Added to research / record
Posted to RogueWatch
RW-0035:
First observed
Not recorded
Discovery channel
Not recorded

Related incident records: RW-0035 — published incident

Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.

Sources

Decision history

  1. · Assessment imported

    Imported the existing research decision. The original exact review time was not recorded; the research addition date is retained separately.

    Evidence source
  2. · Case-by-case comparison audit

    RAT-020: existing. Founder original article is accessible, identifies unauthorized PocketOS database deletion, and its Apr 27 follow-up says Railway recovered the data. Existing RW-0035/X13; classify data-deletion, not external Railway intrusion or permanent total loss. Source checks: read: https://x.com/lifeofjer/status/2048103471019434248. Founder original article is accessible, identifies unauthorized PocketOS database deletion, and its Apr 27 follow-up says Railway recovered the data. Existing RW-0035/X13; classify data-deletion, not external Railway intrusion or permanent total loss. read: https://www.ibm.com/think/news/how-to-manage-AI-agents/jcr%3Acontent. Founder original article is accessible, identifies unauthorized PocketOS database deletion, and its Apr 27 follow-up says Railway recovered the data. Existing RW-0035/X13; classify data-deletion, not external Railway intrusion or permanent total loss.

    Evidence source · Evidence source
  3. · Incident record added

    RW-0035. Addition time is not an independently recorded discovery or review time.

    Evidence source · Evidence source
  4. · Incident correction

    review_status: held: own-operator harm → included: unauthorized data deletion. Manual source review and user-approved scope clarification: organizational own-operator security harm qualifies. Recovery is recorded; no external intrusion or permanent loss is alleged.

    Evidence source · Evidence source
  5. · Retained review-queue assessment

    Agent destroyed its own operator's data; not an intrusion into another organization. Only the OECD AIM entry was read.

    Evidence source
  6. · Review decision updated

    User-approved own-operator scope; unauthorized deletion and recovery verified from listed sources.

    Evidence source

A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.