Public research record · Editorial guide updated 2026-10-29

Straiker documented AI systems in CARLIY0S bank attacks

Review RAT-064 · Catalogue RAT-064

RogueWatchOut of scope

Straiker technical PDF publishes commander-driven offensive role prompts and actor target scope. Human-directed criminal operation; no autonomous deviation from operator intent. 400+ refers to targets, not confirmed breaches.

Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1

Dates and discovery

Incident date
Not disclosed
Added to research / record
Posted to RogueWatch
No linked public incident
First observed
2026-10-30T13:13:36.190826Z UTC
Discovery channel
User-supplied comparison audit
Discovery source
https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/carliy0s-ai-assisted-bank-attacks/

Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.

Sources

Decision history

  1. · Case-by-case comparison audit

    RAT-064: out-of-scope. Straiker technical PDF publishes commander-driven offensive role prompts and actor target scope. Human-directed criminal operation; no autonomous deviation from operator intent. 400+ refers to targets, not confirmed breaches. Source checks: read: https://www.straiker.ai/blog/inside-carliy0s-how-cybercartel-used-multiple-ai-models-to-attack-latin-american-banks. Straiker technical PDF publishes commander-driven offensive role prompts and actor target scope. Human-directed criminal operation; no autonomous deviation from operator intent. 400+ refers to targets, not confirmed breaches. read: https://info.straiker.ai/hubfs/Ebooks-Whitepapers/Straiker-Inside-CARLIY0S-Threat-Report.pdf. Straiker technical PDF publishes commander-driven offensive role prompts and actor target scope. Human-directed criminal operation; no autonomous deviation from operator intent. 400+ refers to targets, not confirmed breaches.

    Evidence source · Evidence source

A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.