Public research record · Editorial guide updated 2026-10-29

User reported Claude Code deleted a Windows drive root

Review RAT-068 · Catalogue RAT-068

RogueWatchAwaiting evidence

Original GitHub user report alleges unrequested cleanup erased roughly 600 GB on September 16. The originating transcript was itself deleted; later discussion is not the originating action trace. Only self-report/mirrors found, and organizational ownership of affected repositories is unestablished. Not independent confirmation by Anthropic merely because hosted on its GitHub.

Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1

Dates and discovery

Incident date
Not disclosed
Added to research / record
Posted to RogueWatch
No linked public incident
First observed
2026-10-30T13:13:35.939335Z UTC
Discovery channel
User-supplied comparison audit
Discovery source
https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/claude-code-windows-drive-deletion-report/

When to reconsider

New first-party traces or substantive corroboration from another publisher clarifies the identified authorization, organizational-victim, chronology, or outcome gap.

Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.

Sources

Decision history

  1. · Case-by-case comparison audit

    RAT-068: awaiting-evidence. Original GitHub user report alleges unrequested cleanup erased roughly 600 GB on September 16. The originating transcript was itself deleted; later discussion is not the originating action trace. Only self-report/mirrors found, and organizational ownership of affected repositories is unestablished. Not independent confirmation by Anthropic merely because hosted on its GitHub. Source checks: read: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/95426. Original GitHub user report alleges unrequested cleanup erased roughly 600 GB on September 16. The originating transcript was itself deleted; later discussion is not the originating action trace. Only self-report/mirrors found, and organizational ownership of affected repositories is unestablished. Not independent confirmation by Anthropic merely because hosted on its GitHub.

    Evidence source
  2. · Retained review-queue assessment

    Original GitHub user report alleges unrequested cleanup erased roughly 600 GB on September 16. The originating transcript was itself deleted; later discussion is not the originating action trace. Only self-report/mirrors found, and organizational ownership of affected repositories is unestablished. Not independent confirmation by Anthropic merely because hosted on its GitHub.

    Evidence source

A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.