Wiz Red Agent exploited Snowflake GitHub workflow to access Jira
Review RAT-113 · Catalogue RAT-113
Wiz’s original explicitly places Red Agent work under Snowflake’s HackerOne vulnerability-disclosure program and says audit logs identified only Wiz. Exfiltration/read access is the intended authorized research action. Copilot’s role was later corrected to an all-clear review, not proven authorship of the vulnerable change.
Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1
Dates and discovery
- Incident date
- Not disclosed
- Added to research / record
- Posted to RogueWatch
- No linked public incident
- First observed
- 2026-10-30T13:13:38.423796Z UTC
- Discovery channel
- User-supplied comparison audit
- Discovery source
- https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/wiz-red-agent-snowflake-jira/
Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.
Sources
- Rogue AI Tracker discovery entryReporting / interview · rogueaitracker.com
- www.wiz.ioOriginal account · www.wiz.io
Decision history
- · Case-by-case comparison audit
RAT-113: out-of-scope. Wiz’s original explicitly places Red Agent work under Snowflake’s HackerOne vulnerability-disclosure program and says audit logs identified only Wiz. Exfiltration/read access is the intended authorized research action. Copilot’s role was later corrected to an all-clear review, not proven authorship of the vulnerable change. Source checks: read: https://www.wiz.io/blog/red-agent-snowflake-copilot-cicd-bug. Wiz’s original explicitly places Red Agent work under Snowflake’s HackerOne vulnerability-disclosure program and says audit logs identified only Wiz. Exfiltration/read access is the intended authorized research action. Copilot’s role was later corrected to an all-clear review, not proven authorship of the vulnerable change.
Evidence source
A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.