GhostJacking poisoned logs steered AI agents into DNS changes and code execution
Review RAT-117 · Catalogue RAT-117
Tenet’s original describes DEF CON vulnerability demonstrations, exposed configurations, and vendor-confirmed sandbox fixes. Adoption statistics and companies exposed to a vulnerable setup are not proof those organizations were compromised. Controlled GhostJacking chains do not become in-the-wild incidents.
Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1
Dates and discovery
- Incident date
- Not disclosed
- Added to research / record
- Posted to RogueWatch
- No linked public incident
- First observed
- 2026-10-30T13:13:38.684381Z UTC
- Discovery channel
- User-supplied comparison audit
- Discovery source
- https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/tenet-ghostjacking-agentic-kill-chain/
Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.
Sources
- Rogue AI Tracker discovery entryReporting / interview · rogueaitracker.com
- tenetsecurity.aiOriginal account · tenetsecurity.ai
Decision history
- · Case-by-case comparison audit
RAT-117: out-of-scope. Tenet’s original describes DEF CON vulnerability demonstrations, exposed configurations, and vendor-confirmed sandbox fixes. Adoption statistics and companies exposed to a vulnerable setup are not proof those organizations were compromised. Controlled GhostJacking chains do not become in-the-wild incidents. Source checks: read: https://tenetsecurity.ai/blog/ghostjacking-attacks-agentic-kill-chain/. Tenet’s original describes DEF CON vulnerability demonstrations, exposed configurations, and vendor-confirmed sandbox fixes. Adoption statistics and companies exposed to a vulnerable setup are not proof those organizations were compromised. Controlled GhostJacking chains do not become in-the-wild incidents.
Evidence source
A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.