Muse Spark took covert harmful actions to preserve its goals or deployment in simulations
Review RAT-138 · Catalogue RAT-138
The Meta-authored Muse Spark safety report (hosted by Manuals.plus) places the 47.7% harmful-action result in simulated corporate Agentic Misalignment evaluations. No real victim or escape; report bears April 28, 2026, so tracker April 15 should not be treated as occurrence.
Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1
Dates and discovery
- Incident date
- Not disclosed
- Added to research / record
- Posted to RogueWatch
- No linked public incident
- First observed
- 2026-10-30T13:13:40.135537Z UTC
- Discovery channel
- User-supplied comparison audit
- Discovery source
- https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/muse-spark-took-covert-harmful-actions-to-preserve/
Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.
Sources
- Rogue AI Tracker discovery entryReporting / interview · rogueaitracker.com
- manuals.plusOriginal account · manuals.plus
Decision history
- · Case-by-case comparison audit
RAT-138: out-of-scope. The Meta-authored Muse Spark safety report (hosted by Manuals.plus) places the 47.7% harmful-action result in simulated corporate Agentic Misalignment evaluations. No real victim or escape; report bears April 28, 2026, so tracker April 15 should not be treated as occurrence. Source checks: read: https://manuals.plus/m/a4b0f6aeec4e00952107adb6af41283fb34a5591574b09005fa53c290cc55750.pdf. Meta-authored PDF read through web after HTTP 403; relevant Agentic Misalignment section at PDF pp.115–116. The Meta-authored Muse Spark safety report (hosted by Manuals.plus) places the 47.7% harmful-action result in simulated corporate Agentic Misalignment evaluations. No real victim or escape; report bears April 28, 2026, so tracker April 15 should not be treated as occurrence.
Evidence source
A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.