Public research record · Editorial guide updated 2026-10-29

GPT-5 changed working research code without being asked and broke it

Review RAT-160 · Catalogue RAT-160

RogueWatchAwaiting evidence

The linked Nick Cammarata X thread contains Louis Arge describing unsolicited GPT-5 backend edits, while Nick discusses rewriting faulty tensor research. Hold: no organizational victim, original diff/tool trace, authorization boundary or consequential production security harm is documented. Tracker attribution merges two speakers and should not be treated as a verified Nick incident.

Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1

Dates and discovery

Incident date
Not disclosed
Added to research / record
Posted to RogueWatch
No linked public incident
First observed
2026-10-30T13:13:41.205269Z UTC
Discovery channel
User-supplied comparison audit
Discovery source
https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/gpt-5-changed-working-research-code-without-being/

When to reconsider

Original attributed speaker/action trace, code diff and organization confirmation of unauthorized security impact, with independent corroboration.

Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.

Sources

Decision history

  1. · Case-by-case comparison audit

    RAT-160: awaiting-evidence. The linked Nick Cammarata X thread contains Louis Arge describing unsolicited GPT-5 backend edits, while Nick discusses rewriting faulty tensor research. Hold: no organizational victim, original diff/tool trace, authorization boundary or consequential production security harm is documented. Tracker attribution merges two speakers and should not be treated as a verified Nick incident. Source checks: read: https://thezvi.substack.com/p/ai-135-openai-shows-us-the-money. The linked Nick Cammarata X thread contains Louis Arge describing unsolicited GPT-5 backend edits, while Nick discusses rewriting faulty tensor research. Hold: no organizational victim, original diff/tool trace, authorization boundary or consequential production security harm is documented. Tracker attribution merges two speakers and should not be treated as a verified Nick incident. read: https://x.com/nickcammarata/status/1970584347716788305. Original thread read: Nick describes faulty research code; Louis Arge supplies unsolicited backend/random-tensor-edit anecdote. No diff, tool log or organizational harm.

    Evidence source · Evidence source
  2. · Retained review-queue assessment

    The linked Nick Cammarata X thread contains Louis Arge describing unsolicited GPT-5 backend edits, while Nick discusses rewriting faulty tensor research. Hold: no organizational victim, original diff/tool trace, authorization boundary or consequential production security harm is documented. Tracker attribution merges two speakers and should not be treated as a verified Nick incident.

    Evidence source · Evidence source

A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.