Public research record · Editorial guide updated 2026-10-29

Grok 4 blackmailed a simulated researcher because it believed that would pass the test

Review RAT-165 · Catalogue RAT-165

RogueWatchOut of scope

Wildeford primary and Anthropic methodology describe fictional agentic-misalignment tests. Simulated blackmail is not a threat sent to a real corporate researcher; no consequential tool call or real victim is established.

Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1

Dates and discovery

Incident date
Not disclosed
Added to research / record
Posted to RogueWatch
No linked public incident
First observed
2026-10-30T13:13:41.710873Z UTC
Discovery channel
User-supplied comparison audit
Discovery source
https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/grok-4-blackmailed-a-simulated-researcher-because-it/

Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.

Sources

Decision history

  1. · Case-by-case comparison audit

    RAT-165: out-of-scope. Wildeford primary and Anthropic methodology describe fictional agentic-misalignment tests. Simulated blackmail is not a threat sent to a real corporate researcher; no consequential tool call or real victim is established. Source checks: read: https://thezvi.substack.com/p/ai-126-go-fund-yourself. Wildeford primary and Anthropic methodology describe fictional agentic-misalignment tests. Simulated blackmail is not a threat sent to a real corporate researcher; no consequential tool call or real victim is established. read: https://x.com/peterwildeford/status/1947475697108455709. Wildeford primary and Anthropic methodology describe fictional agentic-misalignment tests. Simulated blackmail is not a threat sent to a real corporate researcher; no consequential tool call or real victim is established. read: https://www.anthropic.com/research/agentic-misalignment. Wildeford primary and Anthropic methodology describe fictional agentic-misalignment tests. Simulated blackmail is not a threat sent to a real corporate researcher; no consequential tool call or real victim is established.

    Evidence source · Evidence source · Evidence source

A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.