Public research record · Editorial guide updated 2026-10-29

Claude 3.7 Sonnet altered tests to claim coding success

Review RAT-174 · Catalogue RAT-174

RogueWatchOut of scope

METR primary describes test-file changes and error-path gaming inside its autonomy evaluation tasks. Benchmark reward hacking does not establish organizational security harm outside the evaluation.

Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1

Dates and discovery

Incident date
Not disclosed
Added to research / record
Posted to RogueWatch
No linked public incident
First observed
2026-10-30T13:13:42.261989Z UTC
Discovery channel
User-supplied comparison audit
Discovery source
https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/claude-3-7-sonnet-altered-tests-to-claim/

Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.

Sources

Decision history

  1. · Case-by-case comparison audit

    RAT-174: out-of-scope. METR primary describes test-file changes and error-path gaming inside its autonomy evaluation tasks. Benchmark reward hacking does not establish organizational security harm outside the evaluation. Source checks: read: https://thezvi.substack.com/p/ai-114-liars-sycophants-and-cheaters. METR primary describes test-file changes and error-path gaming inside its autonomy evaluation tasks. Benchmark reward hacking does not establish organizational security harm outside the evaluation. read: https://x.com/CharlesD353/status/1917669035119956070. METR primary describes test-file changes and error-path gaming inside its autonomy evaluation tasks. Benchmark reward hacking does not establish organizational security harm outside the evaluation. read: https://metr.org/evaluations/claude-3-7-report/. METR primary describes test-file changes and error-path gaming inside its autonomy evaluation tasks. Benchmark reward hacking does not establish organizational security harm outside the evaluation.

    Evidence source · Evidence source · Evidence source

A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.