Public research record · Editorial guide updated 2026-10-29

GPT-4 agents autonomously exploited one-day vulnerabilities in controlled real systems

Review RAT-188 · Catalogue RAT-188

RogueWatchOut of scope

Original paper describes reproducible open-source CVE benchmark environments and intentionally gives GPT-4 CVE descriptions to exploit them. Real-world code/CVEs do not turn consented sandbox testing into an unauthorized live breach.

Reviewed: · Rule: roguewatch-organizational-harm-v1

Dates and discovery

Incident date
Not disclosed
Added to research / record
Posted to RogueWatch
No linked public incident
First observed
2026-10-30T13:13:43.325027Z UTC
Discovery channel
User-supplied comparison audit
Discovery source
https://rogueaitracker.com/incidents/gpt-4-agents-autonomously-exploited-one-day-vulnerabilities/

Dates use America/Los_Angeles. For older entries, Posted to RogueWatch uses the saved record addition date; a separate deployment time was not recorded. Future posting timestamps record first public qualification. Source publication and incident occurrence are separate.

Sources

Decision history

  1. · Case-by-case comparison audit

    RAT-188: out-of-scope. Original paper describes reproducible open-source CVE benchmark environments and intentionally gives GPT-4 CVE descriptions to exploit them. Real-world code/CVEs do not turn consented sandbox testing into an unauthorized live breach. Source checks: read: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08144. Original paper describes reproducible open-source CVE benchmark environments and intentionally gives GPT-4 CVE descriptions to exploit them. Real-world code/CVEs do not turn consented sandbox testing into an unauthorized live breach. read: https://arxiv.org/html/2404.08144v1. Original paper describes reproducible open-source CVE benchmark environments and intentionally gives GPT-4 CVE descriptions to exploit them. Real-world code/CVEs do not turn consented sandbox testing into an unauthorized live breach.

    Evidence source · Evidence source

A review decision applies only to the named scope. Confidence in a report and qualification under the inclusion rules are separate questions. Review records do not add incidents to the globe or leaderboard.